Side-by-side specs, scores and live prices. Start over
 72
SCORE
|
✓ WINNER
 76
SCORE
|
|
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Hasselblad | Leica |
| Model | X1D II 50c | Q2 |
Released ⓘRefers to the year this camera was officially made available for sale. |
2019 | 2019 |
Announcement date ⓘRefers to the date the manufacturer publicly announced the upcoming release and general specs of this camera. |
19/06/2019 | 07/03/2019 |
| Camera type | Medium Format | Compact |
| Camera size | 148 x 97 x 70 mm | 130 x 80 x 92 mm |
| Camera weight | 766 g | 734 g |
| Optics | ||
Megapixels ⓘThe higher the number of megapixels, the more detail the cameras sensor can capture. |
50 MP050 | 47.3 MP050 |
Image resolution ⓘImage resolution is measured in pixels and megapixels, width by height. The higher the number, the higher its resolution. |
8272 x 6200 | 8368 x 5584 |
Sensor type ⓘThe camera sensor captures light and records the image. Sensors vary in physical size, the number of pixels, and quality. |
CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size ⓘThe sensor size contributes to the overall quality as well as the dynamic and tonal range a camera can capture. As a rule of thumb, the more surface there is to read the light, the more information it will capture. |
44 x 33 | 24 x 36 |
Sensor format ⓘRefers to the most commonly used sensor sizes. |
Medium Format | Full Frame |
Continuous shooting ⓘThe number of sequential frames per second the camera can write to the memory card when shooting in burst or continuous mode. |
2.7 fps045 | 10 fps045 |
Lens mount ⓘThe lens mount will tell you what type of lens range you can fit onto the camera body. Often the same camera company will have different lens ranges for different cameras. |
Canon EF | Fixed |
Image processor ⓘThe image processor in the camera converts the information collected on the sensor for digital storage on the memory card. |
Unspecified | Maestro II |
Aspect ratio ⓘThe aspect ratio refers to the proportional difference between width and height. The most popular aspect ratios are 3:2 and 4:3. |
4:3 | 3:2 |
Min ISO ⓘRefers to the lowest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Lower ISO are less sensitive to light but make a cleaner image. |
10030200 | 5030200 |
Max ISO ⓘRefers to the highest native (or 'base') ISO setting. Higher ISO is necessary for low-light situations or night photography, but higher ISOs often introduce grain or noise. |
256003003280000 | 500003003280000 |
Min ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
10030200 | 5030200 |
Max ISO (expanded) ⓘExpanded (or extended) ISO is a digitally enhanced feature available on some cameras. It allows you to push beyond the native ISO range if necessary. |
256003003280000 | 500003003280000 |
Minimum shutter speed ⓘThe minimum shutter speed will tell you the longest exposure your camera can take without using an external accessory. |
408044080 | 12044080 |
Max shutter speed ⓘThe maximum shutter speed tells you the length inside 1 second the camera will capture. These can sometimes be extended with accessories such as extra external batteries. |
200080032000 | 200080032000 |
Autofocus points ⓘAutofocus points show where the camera is focusing graphically as squares or brackets in Live View or on an electronic viewfinder. These points are also used for light meter readings. |
1170300 | 2250300 |
In-body stabilisation ⓘIn-body Stabilization means the camera has a certain technology embedded that counteracts camera shake. |
✗ | ✗ |
Viewfinder type ⓘThe viewfinder type is either electronic or optical. Electronic viewfinders will have a small screen in the viewfinder. Optical viewfinders will use prisms and mirrors to look through the lens. |
Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder dots | 369000009900000 | 368600009900000 |
| Video | ||
Video ⓘIndicates if this camera is capable of recording video. |
✓ | ✓ |
Max video resolution ⓘThe best resolution this camera can capture video in. Modern cameras can capture up to 8K video. |
2.7K | 4K |
Max video format ⓘVideo resolution measured by the greatest number of pixels possible in each frame, width by height. A higher resolution means more detail or clarity in your video. |
2720 x 1530 | 4096 x 2160 |
Max video frame rate ⓘHow many frames per second your video will capture. Most cameras have options for multiple frame rates, depending on the resolution you shoot in. For a general video, 24p or 30p is the standard, but more serious filmmakers may need a higher frame rate for creative effect. |
30 fps | 120 fps |
Timelapse built in ⓘA built in time-lapse mode will allow continuous shooting throughout a prolonged period of time to be compressed into a sped up video. |
✗ | ✓ |
Video file format ⓘDifferent cameras can record in various video file formats. The File format you record in can impact how you edit and use the files. |
H. 264 | MPEG-4 |
| Features | ||
Builtin flash ⓘA built-in flash will often be positioned right above the lens. This will automatically pop up when you activate it. |
✗ | ✗ |
External flash ⓘExternal flashes are often connected through a hot shoe at the top of a camera, or a cable at the side of the camera. |
✓ | ✓ |
GPS ⓘGPS features in a camera will include location metadata to each of your photographs. |
✓ | ✗ |
Weather sealing ⓘWeather sealing capabilities will give you more confidence when shooting in unfavourable conditions. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Touch screen ⓘTouchscreen allows you to change camera settings and access menus with a swipe of your finger, instead of using buttons. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Screen size | 3.6" | 3" |
Screen dots ⓘScreen dots indicate the resolution of the LCD screen by including each sub pixel. |
23600001150001500000 | 10400001150001500000 |
Flip screen ⓘA flip screen (or articulating screen) is a second screen which can flip out from the side or top of the camera. This rotating screen allows you more freedom to take photos at different angles. |
✗ | ✗ |
Live view ⓘLive View feature allows you to see a continuous live video of what is being seen through your lens. |
✓ | ✓ |
Wi-Fi ⓘBuilt-in Wi-Fi allows you to connect your camera and share images wirelessly. |
✓ | ✓ |
Bluetooth ⓘBluetooth capabilities allow you wireless control of your camera with other external devices. |
✓ | ✓ |
| Storage & battery | ||
| Memory card | SD / SDHC / SDXC | SD / SDHC / SDXC |
| Dual memory card slots | ✓ | ✗ |
| Battery type | 3400 mAh li-ion | BP-SCL4 |
Battery life ⓘApproximately how long this cameras battery will last measured by how many photographs you will be able to take. |
300 shots1505000 | 350 shots1505000 |
| USB charging | ✗ | ✗ |
The Leica Q2 comes out on top with a score of 76/100, while the Hasselblad X1D II 50c trails slightly behind at 72/100. Both cameras share a 2019 release year, with the Hasselblad X1D II 50c announced in June and the Leica Q2 in March. They also have similar weights, with the Hasselblad X1D II 50c weighing 766g (1.69lbs) and the Leica Q2 at 734g (1.62lbs).
The Leica Q2 excels with its compact size of 130 x 80 x 92mm, making it more portable than the Hasselblad X1D II 50c, which measures 148 x 97 x 70mm. Additionally, the Leica Q2 has a lower launch price of $5000, compared to the Hasselblad X1D II 50c’s $5750.
The Hasselblad X1D II 50c, on the other hand, boasts a medium format camera type, which typically offers superior image quality over compact cameras like the Leica Q2. However, this advantage does not seem to outweigh the benefits of the Leica Q2’s compact size and lower price.
When considering these factors, the Leica Q2 emerges as the more appealing option for many users, due to its portability, lower price, and only slightly lower score compared to the Hasselblad X1D II 50c.
The Leica Q2 wins in the optics comparison with a score of 79/100, while the Hasselblad X1D II 50c scores 68/100. Both cameras share certain specifications, such as having a CMOS sensor and no image stabilization. However, they differ in various aspects that contribute to their overall performance.
The Leica Q2 has a higher DXOMARK score of 96 for its sensor, compared to the Hasselblad X1D II 50c’s score of 72. This indicates that the Q2’s sensor provides better image quality. Additionally, the Q2 has a faster shooting speed of 10 frames per second, compared to the X1D II 50c’s 2.7 frames per second. This makes the Q2 more suitable for capturing fast-moving subjects. The Leica Q2 also has a full-frame sensor and a 3:2 aspect ratio, which is a common format for photography.
On the other hand, the Hasselblad X1D II 50c has a larger medium format sensor, which can potentially deliver better image quality due to its larger size. It also has a higher megapixel count of 50 compared to the Leica Q2’s 47.3, allowing for more detailed images. The X1D II 50c features a Hasselblad X lens mount, which offers the flexibility of interchangeable lenses, unlike the Leica Q2’s fixed lens mount.
In terms of optics, the Leica Q2 outperforms the Hasselblad X1D II 50c due to its higher sensor score and faster shooting speed. However, the X1D II 50c’s larger sensor and interchangeable lens mount may be preferable for those seeking more flexibility and potential for higher image quality. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.
The Leica Q2 outperforms the Hasselblad X1D II 50c in video capabilities, with a significant 41-point difference in their video scores (91/100 for Leica Q2 and 50/100 for Hasselblad X1D II 50c). Both cameras share some common specifications, but the Leica Q2 offers superior features, making it the better choice for video enthusiasts.
Both cameras have maximum video resolutions and maximum video frame rates. However, the Leica Q2 boasts a higher max video resolution at 4K (4096 x 2160) compared to the Hasselblad X1D II 50c’s 2.7K (2720 x 1530) resolution. Additionally, the Leica Q2 offers a significantly higher max video frame rate of 120fps, while the Hasselblad X1D II 50c only reaches 30fps. These differences result in the Leica Q2 delivering sharper and smoother video footage.
Moreover, the Leica Q2 has a built-in time-lapse functionality, which the Hasselblad X1D II 50c lacks. This feature enables the Leica Q2 to capture stunning time-lapse sequences, further enhancing its video capabilities.
On the other hand, the Hasselblad X1D II 50c does not offer any notable advantages in video performance over the Leica Q2. The lower video score and fewer features make it less suitable for those prioritizing video capabilities in their camera choice.
Given the substantial differences in video scores and features, the Leica Q2 is the clear winner in terms of video capabilities. Its higher max video resolution, faster max video frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality make it a superior choice for video enthusiasts. In contrast, the Hasselblad X1D II 50c falls short in this aspect, making it less appealing for users who value video performance.
The Hasselblad X1D II 50c triumphs over the Leica Q2 in features, scoring 87 out of 100 points, while the Leica Q2 lags behind with 83 points. Both cameras share common specifications, such as touchscreen functionality, the absence of a flip screen, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.
The X1D II 50c boasts a larger screen size of 3.6 inches compared to the Q2’s 3-inch screen. Additionally, the Hasselblad’s screen resolution is significantly higher at 2,360,000 dots, offering a clearer and more detailed display than the Leica Q2’s 1,040,000 dots. Moreover, the X1D II 50c features GPS, enabling accurate geotagging of images and easy tracking of shooting locations.
On the other hand, the Leica Q2 possesses a few advantages. It is a more compact and lighter camera, making it more portable and easier to handle, especially during long shooting sessions. However, the Hasselblad X1D II 50c’s superior features outweigh this advantage.
Considering the specifications, the Hasselblad X1D II 50c emerges as the better camera in terms of features, with a larger and higher-resolution screen as well as GPS functionality. While the Leica Q2 offers the benefit of a more compact design, it falls short in competing with the X1D II 50c’s advanced features. Thus, photographers seeking a feature-rich camera should opt for the Hasselblad X1D II 50c, while those prioritizing portability may find the Leica Q2 more suitable.
The Hasselblad X1D II 50c outperforms the Leica Q2 in the storage and battery category, scoring 49/100 compared to the Leica Q2’s 21/100. Both cameras accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards and neither offer USB charging.
The X1D II 50c has a significant advantage with two memory card slots, allowing for more storage and backup options. However, the Leica Q2 has a slightly better battery life with 350 shots, compared to the X1D II 50c’s 300 shots. The X1D II 50c uses a 3400 mAh li-ion battery, while the Q2 uses a BP-SCL4 battery.
Despite the Leica Q2’s longer battery life, the Hasselblad X1D II 50c’s additional memory card slot gives it the edge in the storage and battery category. Both cameras have their strengths, but the X1D II 50c offers more flexibility and reliability in terms of storage.
Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Hasselblad X1D II 50c or the Leica Q2:
