Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-T30 — Which Is Better?

Fujifilm X-T3 vs X-T30 Overview and Optics

The Fujifilm X-T3 and Fujifilm X-T30 both receive a score of 67/100 for optics, indicating that they have comparable optical performance. These cameras share several specifications, including a 26-megapixel CMOS sensor, X-Processor 4, APS-C sensor size, Fujifilm X lens mount, and a lack of image stabilization. As DXOMARK does not score Fujifilm cameras, there is no DXOMARK sensor score available for either model.

Despite having the same score, the Fujifilm X-T3 outperforms the X-T30 in shooting speed, offering a rate of 20 frames per second (fps) compared to the X-T30’s 30 fps. This advantage allows the X-T3 to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively and produce smoother video footage.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-T30 has a slightly faster shooting speed, which could be beneficial for capturing high-speed action or sports photography. However, this advantage is minimal and may not be a deciding factor for most users.

Both cameras have their strengths and weaknesses in the optics department, with the X-T3 excelling in shooting speed and the X-T30 having a minor advantage in capturing fast action. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user. The Fujifilm X-T3 is better suited for those seeking smoother video footage and improved performance in capturing fast-moving subjects, while the X-T30 may be a more suitable option for users who prioritize high-speed action photography.

The Fujifilm X-T30 is the winner in terms of video capabilities, scoring 91 out of 100, while the Fujifilm X-T3 scored 83. Both cameras share some common features, such as 4K max video resolution and 4096 x 2160 max video dimensions. Additionally, both have built-in time-lapse functionality.

The X-T30 surpasses the X-T3 with its higher max video frame rate of 120fps, compared to the X-T3’s 60fps. This allows the X-T30 to produce smoother slow-motion footage and capture fast-moving subjects with greater detail. Thus, the X-T30 is better suited for videographers who need higher frame rates for their projects.

On the other hand, the X-T3 is not significantly inferior to the X-T30 in terms of video capabilities. Its 60fps max video frame rate is still sufficient for most video applications, and it shares the same max video resolution and dimensions as the X-T30. Therefore, the X-T3 remains a viable option for users who do not require the higher frame rates offered by the X-T30.

In comparing the video capabilities of the Fujifilm X-T3 and X-T30, the X-T30 emerges as the superior choice due to its higher video score and max video frame rate. However, the X-T3 remains a strong contender for those who do not require the additional frame rate capabilities. Both cameras offer excellent video quality, making them suitable options for various video applications.

The Fujifilm X-T3 comes out on top with a feature score of 83/100, compared to the Fujifilm X-T30’s score of 70/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3-inch screen size, 1040000-dot screen resolution, touchscreen capabilities, flip screen, absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The X-T3 surpasses the X-T30 in terms of features, which contributes to its higher score. Its advantages may include better performance, more advanced options, or additional capabilities that are not present in the X-T30. These enhancements make the X-T3 a more appealing choice for photographers who require a more sophisticated camera for their needs.

On the other hand, the X-T30 still has some merits despite its lower feature score. It may offer a more compact design or a lower price point, making it an attractive option for photographers who prioritize portability or affordability. In some cases, the X-T30 may even have unique features not found in the X-T3, catering to specific requirements or preferences.

When considering these cameras, it is essential to weigh the benefits of each model against one’s individual needs and preferences. The Fujifilm X-T3, with its higher feature score, is the better choice for those who seek advanced capabilities and performance. However, the Fujifilm X-T30 remains a viable option for photographers who value portability, affordability, or specific features that may not be present in the X-T3.

The Fujifilm X-T3 outperforms the X-T30 in storage and battery with a score of 68/100 compared to the X-T30’s 35/100. Both cameras share similarities, including accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, using the NP-W126S battery type, and offering USB charging capabilities.

The X-T3 excels with its two memory card slots, providing more storage flexibility compared to the X-T30’s single slot. Additionally, the X-T3 has a slightly longer battery life, capable of capturing 390 shots, whereas the X-T30 captures 380 shots.

The X-T30, though trailing in score, does have a minor advantage in being UHS-I compatible, which allows for faster data transfer speeds. However, this does not significantly impact the overall storage and battery performance compared to the X-T3.

Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-T3 proves to be superior in storage and battery capabilities, while the X-T30 offers a minor advantage in memory card compatibility.