Canon EOS R5 vs Leica SL2-S Comparison

The Canon EOS R5 takes the lead with a score of 86/100, while the Leica SL2-S trails behind with 81/100. Both mirrorless cameras were released in 2020 and share some common specifications. However, the EOS R5 stands out as the better camera for its lighter weight of 680g, compared to the SL2-S’s 931g, and its lower launch price of $4499 versus $4895.

The Canon EOS R5’s compact size (138 x 98 x 88mm) also gives it an advantage over the larger Leica SL2-S (146 x 107 x 83mm). The Leica SL2-S doesn’t have any superior specifications compared to the EOS R5. Therefore, the Canon EOS R5 is the clear winner in terms of general specifications, offering a better value and more compact design.

Canon EOS R5 vs Leica SL2-S Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R5 takes the lead in our optics comparison with a score of 88/100, while the Leica SL2-S follows closely with a score of 85/100. Both cameras share common specifications, such as a 20fps shooting speed, a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and in-camera image stabilization. Additionally, both cameras have a DXOMARK score of 95 for their sensors, showcasing their impressive performance.

The Canon EOS R5 outshines the Leica SL2-S with its higher megapixel count of 45, compared to the Leica’s 24.6 megapixels. This difference allows the EOS R5 to capture more detail and produce higher-resolution images. Additionally, the Canon EOS R5 features a more advanced processor, the Digic X, which contributes to faster processing speeds and improved image quality.

On the other hand, the Leica SL2-S has a unique advantage in its lens mount. The Leica L mount provides users with access to Leica’s exceptional range of lenses, known for their superior optical quality and craftsmanship. While the Canon RF mount offers a growing selection of lenses, the Leica L mount offers a more established and prestigious lineup.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS R5 offers better overall optics performance, mainly due to its higher megapixel count and advanced processor. However, the Leica SL2-S presents an attractive option for those who prioritize access to Leica’s renowned lenses. Ultimately, the choice between these two cameras will depend on the user’s specific needs and preferences in terms of image quality and lens selection.

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Leica SL2-S in video capabilities with a video score of 100/100, while the Leica SL2-S scores 83/100. Both cameras share some common features, such as time-lapse functionality built-in, which is useful for capturing stunning sequences of events unfolding over time.

The Canon EOS R5 excels in video quality, offering a maximum video resolution of 8K and dimensions of 8192 x 4320. This high resolution enables the capture of incredibly detailed and sharp footage, suitable for professional videography. Additionally, the R5 supports a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, allowing for smooth slow-motion playback and greater creative flexibility in post-production.

On the other hand, the Leica SL2-S has a maximum video resolution of 4K and dimensions of 4096 x 2160, which is still considered high quality, but falls short in comparison to the R5. The SL2-S also has a lower maximum video frame rate of 60fps, limiting slow-motion capabilities in comparison to the R5.

Despite the lower score, the Leica SL2-S is still a competent camera for video capture, with its 4K resolution and 60fps frame rate catering to most videography needs. However, for those seeking the highest quality footage and greater slow-motion capabilities, the Canon EOS R5 is the clear winner.

In conclusion, the Canon EOS R5 stands out as a superior camera for video capture due to its higher resolution, dimensions, and frame rate. The Leica SL2-S is a viable option for less demanding videography projects but falls short of the R5’s capabilities, making the Canon EOS R5 the better choice for professional and advanced video work.

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Leica SL2-S with a feature score of 87/100, compared to the latter’s 74/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a 3.2-inch screen size, 2,100,000-dot screen resolution, touchscreen capability, absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth connectivity.

The Canon EOS R5 excels in its additional flip screen feature, which allows for more versatile shooting angles and improved usability in various situations. This proves to be a significant advantage over the Leica SL2-S, which lacks this feature. The higher feature score of the EOS R5 reflects its overall superiority in terms of camera capabilities and user experience.

On the other hand, the Leica SL2-S still performs well in its own right, despite its lower feature score. While it may not have a flip screen, the SL2-S matches the EOS R5 in other aspects such as screen size, resolution, touchscreen, and connectivity options. This indicates that the Leica SL2-S remains a solid choice for photographers who prioritize these specific features.

To conclude, the Canon EOS R5 emerges as the superior camera due to its additional flip screen feature, which enhances its usability and versatility in various shooting scenarios. Meanwhile, the Leica SL2-S still holds its ground as a reliable option for photographers who value the shared specifications between the two cameras. Ultimately, the choice between the Canon EOS R5 and the Leica SL2-S depends on the individual preferences and priorities of the photographer.

The Leica SL2-S wins in the storage and battery category, scoring 73 out of 100, while the Canon EOS R5 scores 68. Both cameras possess two memory card slots and support USB charging. They accept SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards, although the Canon EOS R5 is also compatible with UHS-II and CFexpress cards, providing faster data transfer and larger storage capacity.

The Leica SL2-S outperforms the Canon EOS R5 in battery life, offering 510 shots per charge, compared to the R5’s 320 shots. This longer battery life makes the SL2-S more suitable for extended shooting sessions without the need for constant battery replacement or charging.

However, the Canon EOS R5’s compatibility with UHS-II and CFexpress cards gives it an advantage in terms of storage versatility and speed. This can be beneficial for photographers and videographers who require faster data transfer and larger storage capacities.

Both cameras have their strengths in the storage and battery category. The Leica SL2-S offers better battery life, while the Canon EOS R5 provides more storage options and faster data transfer capabilities.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R5 or the Leica SL2-S:

• Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6
• Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R7
• Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II
• Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R V
• Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a1
• Canon EOS R3 vs EOS R5