Canon EOS R5 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Comparison

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 with a score of 86/100 compared to 82/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2020 and 2022, respectively. They share similar dimensions, with the R5 measuring 138 x 98 x 88mm and the X-H2 at 136 x 93 x 95mm. Additionally, they have comparable weights, with the R5 at 680g and the X-H2 at 660g.

The EOS R5’s higher score reflects its superior performance, which justifies its higher launch price of $4499 compared to the X-H2’s $1999. However, the Fujifilm X-H2 still offers great value for its price point, making it a more budget-friendly option.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS R5 is the better camera for those seeking top-notch performance, while the Fujifilm X-H2 is a more affordable alternative without sacrificing too much quality.

Canon EOS R5 vs Fujifilm X-H2 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 in optics, with a score difference of 7 points (88/100 vs 81/100). Both cameras share some specifications, including a CMOS sensor, image stabilization, and a similar processor (Canon’s Digic X and Fujifilm’s X-Processor 5).

The Canon EOS R5 excels in several areas. It has a higher megapixel count (45 vs 40), allowing for more detailed images. Its shooting speed is also faster at 20 frames per second, compared to the Fujifilm X-H2’s 15. The EOS R5’s sensor is full-frame, providing a larger surface area for light capture and potentially better image quality. Additionally, its DXOMARK score for the sensor is 95, although it is worth noting that DXOMARK does not score Fujifilm cameras. The Canon RF lens mount allows for a wide range of high-quality lenses.

The Fujifilm X-H2 has some advantages as well. Its APS-C sensor size makes it more compact and lightweight than the full-frame EOS R5. This can be beneficial for photographers who prioritize portability. The Fujifilm X lens mount offers a variety of lenses tailored for the APS-C sensor, ensuring optimal performance.

In comparing the optics of these two cameras, the Canon EOS R5 stands out as the superior choice due to its higher megapixel count, faster shooting speed, and full-frame sensor. However, the Fujifilm X-H2 remains a strong contender for those seeking a more compact and portable camera system.

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 in video capabilities, scoring 100/100 compared to the X-H2’s 83/100. Both cameras share some common features, such as built-in time-lapse functionality, which allows users to create stunning time-lapse videos with ease.

The Canon EOS R5 surpasses the Fujifilm X-H2 in terms of maximum video resolution and frame rate. The R5 has a remarkable 8K resolution (8192 x 4320), providing incredibly detailed and sharp video footage. In addition, the R5 boasts a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, allowing for smooth slow-motion capture and more creative possibilities in post-production.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-H2 has a maximum video resolution of 4K (3840 x 2160), which is still a respectable resolution for most video shooting needs. However, its maximum video frame rate is limited to 60fps, making it less versatile when it comes to capturing fast-paced action or achieving slow-motion effects.

While the Fujifilm X-H2 may not match the Canon EOS R5 in terms of video capabilities, it still offers solid performance for videographers who do not require the highest resolution or frame rate. For some users, the X-H2’s 4K resolution and 60fps frame rate may be more than sufficient for their needs, making it a viable option at a potentially lower price point.

Ultimately, the Canon EOS R5 stands out as the superior option for video capabilities, offering unparalleled resolution and frame rate performance. However, the Fujifilm X-H2 remains a strong contender for those who prioritize other features or have a limited budget.

The Canon EOS R5 wins in the features category with a score of 87 out of 100, compared to the Fujifilm X-H2’s score of 85. Both cameras share several common specifications, including a touchscreen, flip screen, absence of GPS, and the presence of WIFI and Bluetooth capabilities.

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Fujifilm X-H2 in terms of screen size and resolution. The R5 has a larger screen at 3.2 inches, compared to the X-H2’s 3-inch screen. Additionally, the R5 has a higher screen resolution at 2,100,000 dots, while the X-H2 has 1,620,000 dots. These differences contribute to the R5’s higher feature score and provide users with a better viewing experience for composing and reviewing images.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-H2 does not have any significant advantages over the Canon EOS R5 in the features category. Both cameras share the same essential specifications, and the differences in screen size and resolution are not enough to give the X-H2 an edge over the R5.

Considering the points mentioned, the Canon EOS R5 is the superior camera in terms of features. Its larger screen size and higher screen resolution provide users with a better experience when composing and reviewing images. While the Fujifilm X-H2 does not have any significant advantages over the R5, it still offers a competitive set of features that make it a viable option for photographers. However, based on the scores and specifications, the Canon EOS R5 is the better choice for those prioritizing features in their camera selection.

The Fujifilm X-H2 outperforms the Canon EOS R5 in storage and battery with a score of 79/100, compared to the R5’s 68/100. Both cameras share common specifications, including two memory card slots and USB charging compatibility. They also accept UHS-II compatible SD cards, with the R5 additionally supporting SDHC and SDXC cards, and the X-H2 using CFexpress Type B cards.

The Fujifilm X-H2 excels in battery life, providing 680 shots per charge with its NP-W235 battery, while the Canon EOS R5 offers 320 shots using the LP-E6NH battery. This makes the X-H2 more suitable for extended shooting sessions without needing to change batteries frequently.

The Canon EOS R5, despite its lower score, benefits from accepting a wider range of memory card formats (SD, SDHC, and SDXC). This can be advantageous for photographers who have multiple card types in their collection.

Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-H2 is the superior choice for storage and battery performance, while the Canon EOS R5 provides more flexibility in memory card compatibility.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS R5 or the Fujifilm X-H2:

• Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6
• Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R7
• Canon EOS R5 vs EOS R6 Mark II
• Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a7R V
• Canon EOS R5 vs Sony a1
• Canon EOS R3 vs EOS R5