Canon EOS M50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Comparison

The Canon EOS M50 takes the lead with a score of 59/100, while the Fujifilm X-M1 trails behind at 51/100. Both cameras are mirrorless and were released in 2018 and 2016, respectively. They share similarities in size, with the M50 measuring 116 x 88 x 59mm and the X-M1 at 117 x 67 x 39mm. However, the M50 is slightly heavier at 390g compared to the X-M1’s 330g.

The higher score of the Canon EOS M50 can be attributed to its more advanced features and better overall performance. On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-M1 has a lower launch price of $700, making it more affordable for those on a budget.

Taking all factors into account, the Canon EOS M50 emerges as the superior camera, while the Fujifilm X-M1 can be considered a more budget-friendly option.

Canon EOS M50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS M50 triumphs over the Fujifilm X-M1 in our optics comparison with a score of 59/100, a 6-point lead over the X-M1’s 53/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor type, APS-C sensor size, and the absence of image stabilization. However, the EOS M50 outperforms the X-M1 in multiple aspects, making it the superior choice in terms of optics.

The EOS M50 boasts a higher megapixel count at 24 compared to the X-M1’s 16 megapixels, allowing for more detailed and higher resolution images. Additionally, the M50 features a faster shooting speed of 10 frames per second, double the X-M1’s 5.6 frames per second. This difference enables capturing fast-moving subjects with greater ease and accuracy. The M50 also benefits from the advanced Digic 8 processor, which contributes to better image quality and faster performance compared to the X-M1’s EXR Processor II.

While the Fujifilm X-M1 does not surpass the Canon EOS M50 in any specific optical aspect, it is worth noting that DXOMARK does not score Fujifilm cameras. This means the X-M1’s sensor performance cannot be directly compared to the M50’s DXOMARK score of 58. Nevertheless, the Canon EF-M lens mount on the M50 offers compatibility with a wide range of Canon lenses, while the X-M1’s Fujifilm X lens mount is limited to Fujifilm lenses.

Given the higher megapixel count, faster shooting speed, and advanced processor of the Canon EOS M50, it is the superior choice for those prioritizing optics. The Fujifilm X-M1, though not outperforming the M50, remains a viable option for Fujifilm enthusiasts and those who prefer the brand’s lenses.

The Canon EOS M50 outperforms the Fujifilm X-M1 in video capabilities, with a video score of 91/100 compared to the X-M1’s 43/100. Both cameras share some common video specifications, such as the ability to record high-quality footage and capture clear images. However, the EOS M50 has several advantages over the X-M1, making it the superior choice for videographers.

One of the key advantages of the EOS M50 is its 4K video resolution, which allows for recording at a maximum dimension of 3840 x 2160 pixels. In contrast, the X-M1 only offers Full HD resolution, with a maximum dimension of 1920 x 1080 pixels. This difference in resolution results in significantly better video quality from the EOS M50, providing sharper and more detailed footage.

In addition to the higher resolution, the EOS M50 also offers a maximum video frame rate of 120fps, which is four times faster than the X-M1’s 30fps. This higher frame rate enables the EOS M50 to capture smoother motion and produce better slow-motion footage, further enhancing its video capabilities.

Another advantage of the EOS M50 is its built-in time-lapse functionality, which allows for the creation of stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional software or equipment. The X-M1, on the other hand, does not have this feature, limiting its creative potential in this area.

While the Fujifilm X-M1 may be suitable for casual video recording, it is clear that the Canon EOS M50 is the superior choice for those seeking advanced video capabilities and higher quality footage. With its higher video score, 4K resolution, faster frame rate, and built-in time-lapse functionality, the EOS M50 is the better camera for videographers.

The Canon EOS M50 triumphs over the Fujifilm X-M1 with a feature score of 70 out of 100, compared to the X-M1’s 54 points. Both cameras share some common specifications such as 3-inch screen size, flip screens, lack of GPS, WIFI, and Bluetooth connectivity. However, there are significant differences that make the EOS M50 a superior choice.

The EOS M50 excels in screen resolution, boasting 1,040,000 dots, while the X-M1 has a lower resolution of 920,000 dots. This higher resolution provides clearer and sharper images on the EOS M50’s screen. Furthermore, the EOS M50 has a touchscreen, which the X-M1 lacks. The touchscreen allows for easy navigation through menus and quick adjustments to settings, offering a more user-friendly experience.

On the other hand, the Fujifilm X-M1 has some advantages too. The X-M1 shares the same screen size and flip screen feature, making it suitable for capturing images from various angles and aiding in composition. Additionally, the X-M1 matches the EOS M50 in terms of connectivity options, such as WIFI and Bluetooth, enabling seamless transfer of images and remote control of the camera.

Despite the similarities, the Canon EOS M50’s higher feature score, improved screen resolution, and touchscreen functionality make it a better choice for photographers seeking an advanced camera with user-friendly features. While the Fujifilm X-M1 offers some comparable specifications, it falls short in key areas, making the EOS M50 the clear winner in this comparison.

The Fujifilm X-M1 outperforms the Canon EOS M50 in storage and battery with a score of 21 points, compared to the M50’s 13 points. Both cameras share similarities, such as having a single memory card slot and compatibility with SD, SDHC, and SDXC (UHS-I) memory cards. Neither camera provides USB charging capabilities.

The X-M1’s superior battery life of 350 shots, using the NP-W126 battery, gives it an advantage over the EOS M50, which only offers 235 shots with its LP-E12 battery. However, the M50 does not have any distinct advantages in storage and battery compared to the X-M1.

Considering these factors, the Fujifilm X-M1 proves to be a better choice in terms of storage and battery performance. The longer battery life ensures extended shooting time, making it a more reliable option for photographers.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS M50 or the Fujifilm X-M1:

• Canon EOS M50 vs EOS M50 Mark II
• Canon EOS M50 vs Nikon Z50
• Canon EOS M200 vs EOS M50
• Canon EOS M5 vs EOS M50
• Canon EOS M50 vs Sony a6400
• Canon EOS M50 vs Sony a6000