Canon EOS 60D vs Canon EOS 6D Mark II — Which Is Better?

Canon EOS 60D vs EOS 6D Mark II Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS 60D in optics with a score of 69/100 compared to the 60D’s 43/100. Both cameras share similarities such as the CMOS sensor type, absence of image stabilization, and compatibility with Canon EF lenses. However, the 6D Mark II surpasses the 60D in several key specifications.

The 6D Mark II has a higher megapixel count at 26.2, compared to the 60D’s 18 megapixels. This difference allows the 6D Mark II to capture more detail and produce higher resolution images. The 6D Mark II also has a faster shooting speed of 6.5 frames per second, compared to the 60D’s 5.3. This advantage enables the 6D Mark II to capture fast-moving subjects more effectively.

Furthermore, the 6D Mark II boasts a superior sensor size with a full-frame sensor, while the 60D has an APS-C sensor. The larger sensor in the 6D Mark II contributes to better low-light performance and increased dynamic range. The 6D Mark II also has a more advanced processor, the Digic 7, compared to the 60D’s Digic 4, resulting in faster image processing and improved performance.

The 60D does not have any significant advantages over the 6D Mark II in terms of optics. The lower score of the 60D reflects its inferior specifications compared to the 6D Mark II.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS 6D Mark II is the clear winner in terms of optics. Its higher megapixel count, faster shooting speed, larger sensor size, and more advanced processor make it a superior camera compared to the Canon EOS 60D.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II outperforms the Canon EOS 60D in video capabilities with a video score of 57/100, a 14-point advantage over the 60D’s score of 43/100. Both cameras share some common video specifications, such as Full HD video resolution and a maximum video dimension of 1920 x 1080. Additionally, they both have a maximum video frame rate of 30fps.

The 6D Mark II’s higher video score reflects its superior features. One notable advantage is the built-in time-lapse functionality, which enables users to create stunning time-lapse videos without the need for additional equipment or software. This feature sets the 6D Mark II apart from the 60D, making it a more versatile choice for videographers.

On the other hand, the 60D does not offer any significant advantages in video performance over the 6D Mark II. Both cameras share the same maximum video resolution, dimensions, and frame rate. The lack of built-in time-lapse functionality in the 60D further limits its video capabilities in comparison to the 6D Mark II.

Given these factors, it is clear that the Canon EOS 6D Mark II is the superior choice for video performance. Its built-in time-lapse functionality and overall higher video score make it a more versatile and capable camera for videographers. The Canon EOS 60D, while still offering decent video quality, falls short in comparison due to its lack of time-lapse functionality and lower video score.

The Canon EOS 6D Mark II surpasses the Canon EOS 60D in terms of features, scoring 83/100 compared to the 60D’s 57/100. Both cameras share similarities in screen size and resolution, with 3-inch screens and a resolution of 1,040,000 dots. They also both possess flip screens, allowing for easier composition and shooting in various angles.

The 6D Mark II excels with its additional features, such as a touchscreen, GPS, WiFi, and Bluetooth capabilities. The touchscreen enables easier and quicker navigation through menus and settings. GPS functionality allows for geotagging of images, which is useful for travel and landscape photographers. The inclusion of WiFi and Bluetooth offers convenience in transferring images to devices and remote control of the camera.

Though the 60D lacks these features, it still serves as a solid camera for photography enthusiasts and those on a budget. It is worth noting that the 60D is often available at a lower price point than the 6D Mark II, making it a more accessible option for some users.

When considering these points, the 6D Mark II proves to be the superior camera in terms of features. Its additional capabilities cater to a wider range of photographers and provide enhanced convenience and functionality. The 60D, while lacking these advanced features, remains a competent option for those seeking a more affordable camera. Ultimately, the choice between the two cameras depends on the individual’s needs and preferences.

The Canon EOS 60D and Canon EOS 6D Mark II both score 45/100 in storage and battery. They share similarities in their storage capacities, with each camera having one memory card slot and accepting SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards. However, the EOS 6D Mark II supports UHS-I compatible cards, which provide faster read and write speeds.

The 6D Mark II has a slightly longer battery life, offering 1200 shots compared to the 60D’s 1100 shots. This difference is due to the 6D Mark II using the LP-E6N battery type, while the 60D uses the LP-E6 battery type. Neither camera offers USB charging.

Despite the EOS 6D Mark II’s marginally better battery life and UHS-I compatibility, both cameras have nearly identical scores in storage and battery. Potential buyers should consider other factors, such as general specifications, optics, video, and features, when deciding between these two Canon models.