CameraReviews.com
menu
Hi Camera Lovers 👋 If you buy a camera through our referral links, you support our site at no cost to you 😉 Full info here.

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS R5 Comparison

Optics
Video
Features
Storage & Battery

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II

Canon EOS 1D Mark II
73%

Canon EOS R5

canon eos r5
Winner!
86%
Canon EOS 1D X Mark II
vs
Canon EOS R5
Price
Brand
Canon
Canon
Model
EOS 1D X Mark II
EOS R5
Released
2016
2020
Announcement Date
February 02, 2016
July 30, 2020
Camera Type
DSLR
Mirrorless
Camera Size
Camera Weight

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II with a score of 86/100 compared to 73/100. Both cameras share some specifications, such as being from the Canon EOS family and having similar dimensions. The R5, however, excels as a mirrorless camera with a lower launch price of $4499 and lighter weight of 680g. The 1D X Mark II, a DSLR, has a higher launch price of $6000 and weighs 1530g.

The R5’s higher score indicates its superior features and performance. The 1D X Mark II, however, still has its merits, especially for those who prefer DSLRs. When considering these cameras, it’s essential to weigh the pros and cons of each based on individual needs and preferences.

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS R5 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II in optics with a score of 88/100 compared to 72/100. Both cameras share several specifications, including a CMOS sensor, full-frame sensor size, and a similar processor (Digic X for the R5 and Dual Digic 6+ for the 1D X Mark II).

The EOS R5 excels with its higher megapixel count (45 vs. 20.2), faster shooting speed (20 vs. 16), and better DXOMARK score for the sensor (95 vs. 88). These features contribute to the R5’s superior image quality and performance. Additionally, the R5 has built-in image stabilization, which aids in capturing sharp images, especially in low-light conditions or when using slower shutter speeds.

On the other hand, the 1D X Mark II has its advantages. It features the Canon EF lens mount, which provides compatibility with a wide range of EF lenses. This is particularly useful for photographers who already own Canon EF lenses and do not wish to invest in new RF lenses for the R5. However, it is important to note that the R5’s Canon RF lens mount allows for more advanced lens designs and improved communication between the camera and lens.

In terms of optics, the Canon EOS R5 is the clear winner with its higher score, better performance, and additional features such as image stabilization. The 1D X Mark II, while still a solid choice, falls short in comparison. However, its compatibility with EF lenses may be an appealing factor for some photographers.

Optics
Optics
72%
88%
Megapixels
20.2 MP
45 MP
Image Resolution
5472 x 3648 px
8192 x 5464 px
Sensor Type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor Size
24 x 36 mm
23.9 x 35.9 mm
Sensor Format
Full Frame
Full Frame
Frame Rate
16 fps
20 fps
Lens Mount
Canon EF
Canon RF
Image Processor
Dual Digic 6+
Digic X
Aspect Ratio
3:2
3:2
Minimum ISO (Native)
100
100
Maximum ISO (Native)
51,200
51,200
Minimum ISO (Expanded)
50
100
Maximum ISO (Expanded)
409600
102400
Minimum Shutter Speed
30 s
30 s
Maximum Shutter Speed
1/ 8000 s
1/ 8000 s
Autofocus Points
61
1,053
In-body Stabilization
Viewfinder Type
Optical (pentaprism)
Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution
N/A
5,760,000 dots

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS R5 Video Performance

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II in video capabilities with a score of 100/100 compared to 69/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as 4K video resolution and time-lapse functionality. However, the R5 surpasses the 1D X Mark II in several aspects, making it the better choice for videographers.

The R5 boasts a superior 8K video resolution, doubling the 1D X Mark II’s 4K capability. This results in significantly greater detail and clarity in video footage. Additionally, the R5 offers a higher max video dimension of 8192 x 4320, compared to the 1D X Mark II’s 4096 x 2160. This increased size allows for more flexibility in post-production and higher quality output.

Another advantage the R5 has over the 1D X Mark II is its max video frame rate of 120fps, double that of the 1D X Mark II’s 60fps. This enables the R5 to capture smoother slow-motion footage and provides more versatility in various shooting scenarios. Furthermore, the R5 features built-in time-lapse functionality, which the 1D X Mark II lacks.

While the 1D X Mark II has lower video capabilities, it may still be suitable for those who do not require the advanced features of the R5. However, for those seeking the best video performance, the R5 is the clear winner.

Considering all the points discussed, the Canon EOS R5 is the superior choice for videographers due to its advanced video capabilities, including 8K resolution, higher max video dimensions, and increased frame rate. While the 1D X Mark II may suffice for some users, the R5’s features make it the better camera for those who prioritize video performance.

Video
Video
69%
100%
Video
Max Video Resolution
4K
8K
Max Video Dimensions
4096 x 2160 px
8192 x 4320 px
Max Video Frame Rate
60 p
120 p
Time-Lapse Built In
Video File Format
MOV, MP4
MP4

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS R5 Features and Benefits

The Canon EOS R5 outperforms the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II in features with a score of 87/100 compared to the latter’s 74/100. Both cameras share a 3.2-inch screen size and touchscreen capabilities. However, the R5 boasts a higher screen resolution of 2,100,000 dots, while the 1D X Mark II has a resolution of 1,620,000 dots.

The R5 has additional features that give it an edge, such as a flip screen, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth capabilities. These features enhance user experience, making it easier to capture images from various angles and share them quickly. On the other hand, the 1D X Mark II lacks these features, which limits its flexibility and connectivity options.

The 1D X Mark II has one advantage over the R5, which is its built-in GPS. This feature allows users to geotag their images, providing valuable information about the location where the photos were taken. The R5 does not have this feature, which may be a drawback for photographers who require geotagging.

In comparing the two cameras, the Canon EOS R5 offers more advanced features, making it the better choice for photographers who prioritize screen resolution, connectivity, and flexibility. The Canon EOS 1D X Mark II, while still a strong contender, falls short in these areas. However, its built-in GPS makes it a suitable option for those who need geotagging capabilities. Each camera has its strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice ultimately depends on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

Features
Features
74%
87%
Built-in Flash
External Flash
GPS
Weather Sealing
Screen Type
LCD
LCD
Touch Screen
Screen Size
3.2"
3.2"
Screen Resolution
1,620,000 dots
2,100,000 dots
Flip Screen
Live View
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS R5 Storage and Battery

The Canon EOS 1D X Mark II triumphs over the Canon EOS R5 in storage and battery, scoring 79/100 compared to the R5’s 68/100. Both cameras offer two memory card slots, but the 1D X Mark II accepts Compact Flash and CFast 2.0 cards, while the R5 is compatible with SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II) and CFexpress cards.

The 1D X Mark II outperforms the R5 in battery life, delivering 1210 shots with its LP-E19 battery compared to the R5’s 320 shots using an LP-E6NH battery. However, the R5 holds an advantage in USB charging capabilities, which the 1D X Mark II lacks.

Considering these factors, the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II is superior in terms of storage and battery life, making it a more reliable choice for extended shooting sessions. The Canon EOS R5, while offering more modern storage options and USB charging, falls short in battery performance.

Storage and Battery
Storage and Battery
79%
68%
Memory Card
Compact Flash, CFast 2.0
SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible), CFexpress
Dual Memory Card Slots
Battery Type
LP-E19
LP-E6NH
Battery Life
1,210 shots
320 shots
USB Charging
DXOMARK Scores
Sensor scores tested by DXOMARK
Overall Score
88%
95%
Portrait (Color Depth)
24.1 bits
25.3 bits
Landscape (Dynamic Range)
13.5 EVs
14.6 EVs
Sports (Low-Light ISO)
3207
3042
Scores
Main Features
N/A
96%
Extra Features
N/A
92%
Construction and Durability
N/A
100%
Handling and Ergonomics
N/A
100%
Value for Money
N/A
85%
Total Score
N/A
94%

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS R5 – Our Verdict

Canon EOS 1D X Mark II vs EOS R5 Comparison image.

Are you still undecided about which camera is right for you? Have a look at these popular comparisons that feature the Canon EOS 1D X Mark II or the Canon EOS R5:

User Scores
Spotted a mistake with these specs? Please let us know so we can update it!